I've reviewed Greg's books in the past, not only on this blog, but on two literary blogs that I used to maintain, as well as two mainstream media blogs. The first,
Three Cups of Tea, was captivating and for many an introduction to the problems of getting an education in Afghanistan. It was (and still is) considered essential reading.

The second book,
Stones Into School, I was less enthusiastic about.
I reviewed it here, and while I recommended it, also urged readers to pick up other books as well. There were things that bothered me --mainly the sequencing of the events, and also the sense that Mortenson seemed to be the only one who could speak on behalf of the Central Asia Institute. It seemed odd because most NPO's usually have not one, but several persons who can do speaking engagements on behalf of the organization.
60-Minutes did an exposé, interviewing not only the distinguished American Institute of Philanthropy, which found odd accounting practices, but also others who had been on the ground in Afghanistan. Even author John Krakauer, who seems to have a knack for jumping from griddle to griddle lately, and used to be a supporter of CAI. All of them spoke out about exaggerations and fabrications in both books.
I can't speak about what did and didn't get built, but because this is a literary milspouse blog, and because I am a writer, I'll

toss a stone into the pond, and hope to hit or get near the target in terms of the writing and publishing.
1. I wonder how the first book was pitched. Did Greg pitch the book? Did a colleague from the CAI? It's important because somehow, he picked up a co-author for
Three Cups of Tea. I don't know if the publisher read the initial pitch and said, "Oh, that's so great" and assigned him the co-author
or if Greg had him from the get go. The co-author had the task of cobbling together a story in which he only had Mortenson to rely upon for its veracity. But, pulling together events for a story that has a good pace and is compelling does not warrant exaggerations and falsehoods.
2. It matters because if the publisher provided the co-authors for both books, were they anticipating a best seller, and did the writing team feel the need to craft a story more compelling than things were? Note, I use the word
craft, because that's what a good wordsmith does. We play with words, sequencing, and pace. We are always concerned with holding the reader's attention. But this doesn't mean, one can't do the same with the truth.
Everyone who has been to Afghanistan knows there's a lot of waiting --things can crawl and boredom is often in ample supply. However, Mortenson's books are an adventure. They have high drama, tragedy, action, and endings where things turn out well. If one considers the structure of the books: the pace, the positioning of Mortenson as the vulnerable and gullible hero in the first, and then the transformation of him as the infallible hero in the second, makes both books seem like movies. Damn. They're almost too good to be true.

3. Last month in
The Writer's Chronicle, published by the Association of Writers & Writing Programs, author Aleksander Hemon said,
"...there is a problem of memoiristic writing, and there are many problems with that. Not many people really deserve to tell their stories, as they don't really have much to say. Also, they're painting themselves into a corner, because how many books of addiction can you write in a lifetime?
While Mortenson's story isn't one of addiction, there is the problem of having to construct a compelling story that will make it a best seller.
Three Cups of Tea wasn't the corner, rather it led to an unpainted hallway of millions, notoriety, and personal reliability. It was a first time novel that made millions. Hopefully, a second book should be bigger than the first.
Stones Into School was big as well, perhaps not as big as the first, but enough to be released just before Christmas in 2009.
If anyone can remember the James Frey book scandal, we might glean clues from it. Frey and his agent submitted a novel. Somewhere along the line, there was a group decision involving the publishing PR team that the manuscript would read better as an autobiography. Memoirs are popular, they're compelling, and there are ways to package them to sell. Hence,
A Million Little Pieces, was fed to the public as Frey's testament to his vomit-strewn life as an addict. It was dramatic, and had an unrelenting pace with a flawed hero you wanted to see get better. It was a best seller, and Oprah hawked it on her show.
It was later exposed for being a lie.And I can't help but wonder if everyone who believed in Mortenson's books has been taken in by the memoir fad.
All of this brings us to an awkward pause.
Yes, he built schools. Maybe not as many as he said, and obviously many have struggled or have been abandoned without oversight or more shockingly --ongoing financial support. But truthfully, without a military presence there to hold and secure the area, there is no controlling how those schools are going to be used.
These things are for certain. Mortenson has done good work. He gave many of us our first taste of the landscape of Afghanistan, which then led to the reading of subsequent books to get a broader understanding. Scores realized how important education was to the future, which led many to believe in outreach efforts like COIN, and to give generously in
every conceivable way.
As someone who has donated, who has encouraged others to do so, whose daughter has helped gather money for Pennies For Peace, I'm pissed off.
But as a reader, I'm also wary. If Mortenson exaggerated, how many more books that have been popular best sellers --not only written by journalists but by soldiers, have followed the same path?
We don't know.
The verdict is still out.
And it might be for quite awhile.